close
close

Nine-year-old and son-level sexual assault charge at school: parents retire, children and demanding sons expelled

Nine-year-old and son-level sexual assault charge at school: parents retire, children and demanding sons expelled

A child’s revelations about being confused by soups at a high level. Parents are demanding “approval admissions” and expelling children for the wrong reason.

Because of the revelations made for an eight-year-old child, and for a mother who accuses another level of sexual aggression at school, the situation tends to be in the La Ciotat camp in Bouches-du-Rhône. Parents of the level claim that the child is excluded from copyright and it is incorrect petition called “protégé of the children of the Louis-Vignolles school.”

Une enquête du chef for sexual aggression at the age of 15 and then he left after the warehouse on the plain of the mother d’un Garçon, Indique BFM. Direction of the school aussi fait un signalement auprès du parquet.

Les faits remontent au jeudi November 14, level CE2 is the explanation for a member of the Periscolaire staff being in a state of aggressive sexual behavior in camaraderie in the toilets. Il s’agit d’un enfant de 9 years, qualification “unintelligible” in terms of what “Les Mineurs de Moins de 13 Ans Sont Présumés are incapable of discrimination”exact website of the Minister of Justice. It’s a fact “l’objet d’une saisine en help educative”indique le parquet.

The victim’s statements about downsizing are vague revelations to other children: all other ont indica children avoid the child being aggressive because it causes panic, and parents do not retire when children retire. school. Une vingtaine manquait à l’appel mardi, namely our colleagues, and also that the alleged author is now present.

Parents demand son “immediate exclusion” that the light shines as if it were business, “enquête approfondieUN “execution of security protocols” etc. “Suspending the duties of the head of the school for burial in the grave to protect our children.”. “Little positive signals, this dangerous behavior corresponds to a danger to the safety and lives of our children. We cannot tolerate a situation where it is under threat that guarantees protection and protection.” écrivent-ils.